Saturday, June 30, 2012

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

/An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

(Source: drunkonstephen)


  1. fightthedarknessandsmile reblogged this from gaycave
  2. transsexual-giraffe reblogged this from caprikitten
  3. rawrimadinosaurlivinglife reblogged this from ectoplasmrainbow
  4. caprikitten reblogged this from hippocratessocrates
  5. ectoplasmrainbow reblogged this from hippocratessocrates
  6. amiguriken reblogged this from capitolwitch and added:
    There’s also the repeated and very valid point that if you’re going to quote Leviticus, you shouldn’t cherry-pick your...
  7. capitolwitch reblogged this from nepetco
  8. wombatsexy reblogged this from crackinthecloud
  9. dragonicstandverlordtheend reblogged this from chouhenshinzeba
  10. wtfwriting reblogged this from drunkpuffin
  11. chouhenshinzeba reblogged this from hippocratessocrates
  12. hippocratessocrates reblogged this from north-and-theta
  13. the-maydole reblogged this from the-maydole
  14. no-ro-ne reblogged this from ilookatyourblog
  15. literalliterature reblogged this from indahizzhouse2
  16. lost-sounds reblogged this from queencalliebitch
  17. ilookatyourblog reblogged this from indahizzhouse2
  18. indahizzhouse2 reblogged this from multimultimero
  19. friendofcirno reblogged this from multimultimero
  20. multimultimero reblogged this from drunkpuffin
  21. queencalliebitch reblogged this from imightbeapsychoticbear
  22. sha-queera reblogged this from spookydi-angelo
  23. noxfornow reblogged this from never-send-me-away-again
  24. karasu-dono reblogged this from battorose
  25. my-potato-has-47-assholes reblogged this from tochaseclouds
  26. squ-artpop reblogged this from shiera-hall
  27. awesomeperson211 reblogged this from bluecomet233
  28. thattortise reblogged this from spoopy-detective
  29. niqueylouis42 reblogged this from fuckyourtriangles